Logo pop logo quiz blue oval6/17/2023 It was inspired by Japanese painter Hokusai. The famous sporting goods company has a red square for a logo, with the off-white outlines of a wave and a mountaintop inside. In 2004, Blockbuster had some 60,000 staff and over 9,000 locations in America. This video and game rental chain is now closed down – it was forced to file for bankruptcy because of the increasing pressure exerted on the market by companies like Redbox and Netflix. The logo is a blue ticket stub, with three of its edges bordered by a yellow line. He took on Jacob Davis’s invention, the work pants, and added copper rivets to their main stress points. The denim clothing company in question was founded in 1853, when a Bavarian clothing manufactureremigrated from Buttenheim, Bavaria, to San Francisco, California. This classic logo is a red geometric shape (inverted trapeze) with a straight line at the top and two curves at the bottom. Ruth Handler, an American businesswoman, is said to have invented it, with German doll Bild Lilli as a source of inspiration. This doll, produced by American company Mattel Inc. The logo is a pink capital B in cursive. ![]() The brand initially belonged to Procter & Gamble. These chips are sold in over 140 countries around the world and sell upward of $1.4 billion each year. Stay tuned for more on this as we learn more.-The logo features a round faced man with a moustache and tuft of hair on his head, with a red bowtie around his neck. If so, given the prevalence and popularity of blue oval logos, how can the Fordless blue oval be considered unique enough to be inherently distinctive? If Ford ends up submitting evidence of use with the Ford brand name superimposed on the blue oval logo, then it appears unavoidable that Ford will have additional refusals issued, for the reasons previously articulated.īut, if Ford actually puts in use of the Fordless blue oval logo - as shown in the drawing without the Ford brand name superimposed - does the PTO’s recent failure to challenge inherent distinctiveness mean that no evidence of acquired distinctiveness or secondary meaning will be required for registration? What remains to be seen (until Ford submits a specimen of use) is whether Ford really will use the above blue oval design without the Ford name brand superimposed, as shown in the drawing submitted to the PTO. So, once these minor details are satisfied the above non-verbal Fordless logo will be published for opposition, and assuming no Amendment to Allege Use is filed prior to the approval for publication and assuming no third party files a Notice of Opposition, then a Notice of Allowance will issue, which will start the clock for Ford to put in evidence of use through a Statement of Use. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), and on October 23, 2009, the PTO found no substantive bases for refusal, but instead it issued an initial refusal noting only a couple of purely procedural or technical deficiencies, concerning the wording in the lengthy description of goods and the need for Ford to submit a claim of ownership to some related registrations ( here, here, and here). ![]() The pending Fordless blue oval intent-to-use trademark application recently was examined by the U.S. ![]() What do you think, is selling bling with the Fordless blue oval logo?Īs you may recall from my post back in September, Ford Motor Company is attempting to register the below shown non-verbal logo as a trademark for a variety of goods in Int’l Class 12:Īnd, as you may recall from Dan’s I See Blue Ovals post back in August, there are far more than a handful of blue oval logos out there besides this one:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |